Comma me down; or, Commas and the Appositive; or, Commas and Nouns Describing Other Nouns

There’s this thing called an appositive. Feel free to forget that word, but remember the rule of commas associated with it. If the renaming or descriptive noun or noun phrase that accompanies the central noun is essential to the identification of that noun, you do not need commas. Examples:

– I am not a polygamist. My husband, Gilbert, gets all my ire. [In this case, there is only one husband, so his name is not essential to the definition. The husband is the one husband; there are no other husbands in this case.]
– I am a polygamist. My husband Gilbert gets all my ire. The other guys get a pass. [In this case, the husband named Gilbert is essential to the definition of husband, to distinguish him from John, Ted, and Arthur, my other husbands. Poor Gilbert.]

– My book Best Seller is a best seller, far outselling my other five books.
– My book, Best Seller, is a best seller, which is amazing, as it is my first and only book.

-There are a million famous authors. I met the famous author Joe Schmo the other day.
-According to narcissist Joe Schmo, there is only one famous author. I met that famous author, Joe Schmo, the other day.

-She is the founder of the girl band Girl Band. (As there are a million girl bands, there would never be any reason to put a comma between girl band and Girl Band. Nor should you ever actually use the term girl band, unless, of course, you are talking about Girl Band.)

Okay, go off and err no more.

DSCN0508

Another One Down; or, How Fiction Betrays the Hopeful Heart

Regular readers of this blog, all three of you, will recall that I have freely admitted to being an impatient reader, quick to judge, quick to become crabby. I rarely read fiction anymore, as it so frequently incites my worst selves. I ghostdrift the aisles of the library, lifting them up to read the back blurb — “ugh, who cares,” I think of one, “ugh, I don’t want to read that,” I think of another. So when I, with fear and trembling, finally check out a volume of fiction in an attempt to be at one with the world, who seems to greedily consume fiction and laud the praises of books hither and yon with “best books of the year” designation, national and international awards, interviews on public radio, etcetera, I yearn to be satisfied. My latest pursuit: a “comic” “genius” at the “top of his game” in a book that was just given a Very Important Prize. As you can tell from my tone…ugh, the disappointment.

When a book disappoints me, I feel it personally, viscerally, deeply. I love books. I read, therefore I am. I forced myself to plod through this thing, through all the author’s jiving and winking, his self-satisfied jocularity, but by page 70 with no discernible plot in sight, I closed it for good. I had been betrayed. How am I so out of step with literary opinion? What does this say about me? Surely something is wrong with me.

On the radio I just heard about a bright new talent in singer/songwriting. “I had never heard anything like this before,” said the Famous Person who discovered this New Talent who sounded EXACTLY LIKE ALL THE OTHER “NEW” POP TALENT I’VE BEEN HEARING FOR THE PAST 10 YEARS. No, for longer than that, as I have a CD from 15 years ago that sounds exactly like this “new sound” — the thin voice that peters out toward the end of notes, the near-glottal stops, the discernible leap between chest and head voice. Heard it. All. Before. What is wrong with me? Surely the emperor can’t be walking around with no clothes to the extent that I seem to perceive.

I’ve counseled myself in the past to read more slowly, be more forgiving, open my mind to the new. All that is true. But certainly taste is real and not every single person can be expected to like the same things as every other person. I read a book of poems recently and thought, “yes, I can see why the editor chose this, I can see the editor being attracted by this,” even though it was not my taste. I was able to move on without feeling grief and ire. So I am capable of some rational maturity when it comes to reading and taste. But then there’s all the other times.

I do worry about my own discernment, that I’m hopelessly limited. I’m not a music aficionado. Perhaps there is something this woman is doing that I’m not picking up on. Maybe this novelist is doing something very important with all his jazzing around. (Or maybe the emperor ought to at least put some underwear on, for crying out loud.)

And maybe it’s just that I owe so much to fiction — I grew up with it, in it, formed by it. It saved me, succored me, awakened me, instructed me. It was a parent to me, and thus prey to all the expectations a child has for a parent. I guess I’m not a grown-up when it comes to reading fiction; I’m a needy child. But just as a parent is only a flawed human being, a novel is too only what it is — a message in a bottle thrown out from one flawed human being into the sea in hopes of finding a sympathetic, nay empathetic reader. And maybe I’ll go back to nonfiction for a while until I grow up a little more.

dsc00714

Tongue Over Teakettle, or, the Pleasures of Surprises in Poetry

I’m reading Stephen Burt’s The Poem Is You, and found myself intrigued and delighted by this poem, whose author was unknown to me: Diane Glancy’s “Hamatawk.”

Hamatawk

 

Just it was (crow tongued) he was saying a caw.
Then wings fold up the Indian
if antlers deer give
totems of the head the anyhow of them.
This coat gets smaller each year
like the tepee I come from
when I (back) to the (space) I was born,
the small hohum of it,
old ones all reversed
smaller the autumn trees than I remember
(the way) old language breaks.
Hum way to hum hum the buzzled wiggle
of the tall grasses smoothed down
by the path of them (to woods) through the field.
I’m going and if not
I come back smaller.
Then he (the crow) sings like this
his mouth he opens. Caw. Caw. The grasses
(wave) they take flight the crow wings (grasses
burnt) all fields shrivel
next the new world.

There are so many surprises and little winks and nudge, and yet sadness and rue.

From the start: backwardization of the title, tomahawk to hamatawk, the wink at talk and the undermining of that tired symbol from our cowboys-and-indians mythology. I

love the various uses of parentheses to describe or circumscribe or clarify, the creation of a “back space,” the questioning of “the way.”

I love the tangled syntaxes and then the flat statement “This coat gets smaller each year…” and the hohum hum hum and caws.

I love when someone else’s work makes me stop in my tracks and say, wow, how did she do that — and how can it inform my work? “Then wings fold up the Indian” and “if antlers deer give/totems of the head the anyhow of them” and “The grasses/(wave) they take flight the crow wings” really interest me in how they make you slow down, consider and reconsider what is doing what and how and why, and the wonder and space of that wonder.

This poem was published in 1991, and Glancy has continued to publish in both poetry and fiction, as well as plays. I look forward to seeing what else her mind has conjured.

DSCN0155

 

 

Get Thee Behind Me, Spider; or How to Deal with Self-Doubt

I have this idea for a performance. I’ve been thinking about this for almost three years. For three years I’ve been darting at the idea, throwing down some words, and then wandering away. Today I said to myself firmly, Okay, you’re going to work on that project today. That was at 9 a.m. It’s now almost 3 p.m. I’ve shouldered that elephant in the room out of the way several times as it’s stood between me and the coffee pot. As you can tell, as I’m talking to you rather than actually working on it, I am in avoidance mode. Why is that? Why do I keep working on it, wander away, and then resist getting back to it, yet still have at least a theoretical interest in the idea?

I realized today that the whole thing is shrouded in doubt, like sticky cobwebs, the kind that may or may not contain spiders. I doubt many things: whether it’s a good idea at all, whether I can pull it off, whether I know enough about what I don’t know, whether I know enough to do a creditable job and not embarrass myself.

Some comedian/inspirational speaker woman I heard once talked about the committee we all sometimes have, a committee who lives in our brain just waiting around to critique what we’re up to. My committee seems to have assembled in response to this threatened performance. Who are they? Who are these snooty opinion-mongers? They are you. They are me. Mostly me. You’ve always been quite supportive, actually.

All art making is a kind of communication, so why has this one conjured up, more than most of my other attempts, this committee? I’ve done performances before, so I’m used to an audience, the faceless foot shifters and program droppers in the dark. No, it’s the inner doubters that are keeping me at bay.

But self-doubt need not be a bad thing. First, it means I’m stretching myself into unfamiliar spaces. This is good. Second, it can make me careful, thoughtful, apt to do some research, some self-education. This is only bad if it becomes what I do instead of doing the thing I’m trying to do.

So now that I’ve identified my doubt, I’m hopeful I can move forward with it rather than against it. I regret I characterized it as a cobweb, as I can’t think of any way to go back now and reclaim the metaphor — cobwebs get caught in the hair and tickle the neck and cause me to feel like spiders are crawling down my sleeve. Self-doubt can’t be swept away. But I can hope to push it aside gently (get off my hand! get off!) and move forward cautiously. I can educate myself about the art and craft I’m embarking on, try to identify some specific aspects that are causing me concern, identify some steps or aspects to focus on, and can muster a new committee to run drafts past, people who will be constructive. And real.

dsc00571

 

Surge; or The Push-Me-Pull-You of Movements; or Read This Book

For every thing, there is a season. And a book. Turn turn turn. More from the Krista Tippett book, whose huge spirit has been a beacon these past weeks. Page after page of grace.

This week it is Reza Aslan who provided the quote I’m thinking about. He said, “We have to remember that fundamentalism is a reactionary phenomenon, not an independent one. It is a reaction to the natural progress of society. And so when I see fundamentalism surge, I know that what is really happening is that the natural progress of society is surging. And fundamentalism is reacting to it. I choose to focus on the progress, not the reaction.”

Do yourself a favor and read this book. Krista Tippett, On Becoming Wise: An Inquiry into the Mystery and Art of Living, Penguin Books, 2016.

DSC00172

 

Body Meets World

Reading and thoughts are converging at the moment. Krista Tippett in Becoming Wise quotes Eve Ensler, in the context of a discussion about consciously being in the body: “You can’t dominate people without separating them from each other and from themselves.” And I think about Ta-Nehisi Coates in Between the World and Me reflecting on the terrifying realities of living in a black body in the world. And I think about Hannah Arendt’s thinking about totalitarianism: “Terror can rule absolutely only over men who are isolated against each other….” And I think about current events, and my ambivalence about my plan to join the women’s march — what is the point, what are we saying? — but will go anyway, to stand together, a mass of bodies in pink hats, and think about misogyny so pervasive and rooted that many would deny its existence at all. And I’ll probably be uncomfortable being a body packed among so many other bodies, and I’ll probably be cold, and perhaps feel a little silly, and I’ll be careful where I park and will be alert to my surroundings when I walk back to my car after dark, and I’ll feel part of a long history of gathering for protest, shoulder to shoulder, together, for the moment. And I think about the installation at MASSMoCA that looks like the abandoned lab of some arctic sea expedition and the image that appears in one of the great pipes curving up from the floor: a digital printout saying, All you need is love, All you need is love, All you need is love.

img_0446